🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."