🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I historically steered clear of extensive use of luck during my D&D adventures. My preference was for the plot and what happened in a game to be guided by player choice instead of the roll of a die. That said, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known podcast showcases a DM who often asks for "luck rolls" from the adventurers. He does this by picking a polyhedral and assigning consequences based on the roll. It's fundamentally no different from consulting a random table, these are devised on the spot when a course of events lacks a predetermined conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own table, mostly because it appeared novel and presented a break from my standard routine. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reflect on the perennial tension between pre-determination and randomization in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Story Beat

At a session, my party had survived a large-scale battle. Afterwards, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had made it. In place of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: a low roll, both died; on a 5-9, a single one would die; on a 10+, they survived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a deeply emotional scene where the party found the bodies of their friends, still clasped together in death. The party held last rites, which was particularly significant due to prior story developments. As a parting reward, I decided that the NPCs' bodies were miraculously transformed, showing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's magical effect was precisely what the party required to resolve another major quest obstacle. One just orchestrate this type of serendipitous moments.

Sharpening Your Improvisation

This experience caused me to question if randomization and making it up are in fact the core of D&D. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Adventurers often take delight in derailing the best constructed narratives. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and create scenarios in real-time.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a excellent way to practice these talents without venturing too far outside your preparation. The trick is to apply them for low-stakes decisions that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. For instance, I wouldn't use it to determine if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to figure out whether the characters arrive moments before a critical event occurs.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

This technique also helps keep players engaged and foster the sensation that the adventure is dynamic, progressing in reaction to their decisions in real-time. It reduces the sense that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned script, thereby strengthening the cooperative nature of storytelling.

This approach has historically been embedded in the core of D&D. Early editions were filled with encounter generators, which fit a game focused on treasure hunting. While contemporary D&D often focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, that may not be the required method.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly nothing wrong with being prepared. But, it's also fine nothing wrong with relinquishing control and permitting the rolls to decide some things instead of you. Control is a big aspect of a DM's role. We need it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to release it, in situations where doing so can lead to great moments.

A piece of advice is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little randomness for smaller details. You might just discover that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you would have scripted in advance.